Communicating Effectively

Posted on Updated on

In the video program, “The Art of Effective Communication,” Jane uses email, voicemail and a face-to­­­-face conversation as a form of communication.  She needs to let Mark know that she needs the information from his missing report in order to complete her own report by another deadline.  If she could get a date that she will receive the information from him or the information by itself it would help her to be on time with her report.  What impact does email, voicemail or face-to-face communication have on her receiving the information?   It is clearly a form of informal communication because it was not planned, and she communicated as soon as she thought of the information and shared it (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, and Kramer, 2008).

Email – Written Communication

I perceived this message to be impersonal, yet important enough to write down so that Mark will have something to reference.   Jane really needs the report from Mark so she can complete her own report.  Sharing information in writing helps to present factual information in a way that should be easy to understand and help to provide a record of the information shared (Portny, et al., 2008).  Jane’s email was short and to the point, however, I think that she could have given Mark a few more details.  Maybe she could have included which report she needs and a personal deadline which gives her time to look over his information to include with her report.  Also, her email is not clear about what information she needs, she has no idea if Mark understands it unless he replies, and there is no proof that Mark received the email and read it.

Voicemail – Audio or Verbal Communication

As I listened to this voicemail, I thought that this was worse than the email.  Jane has no idea if the message was recorded clearly and completely or if Mark checked his messages.  In addition, we do not know if there is a possible language barrier between her and Mark.  It is hard to rewind and keep listening to a telephone message just to write down all of the details.  On the other hand, if communication issues are very serious, then people should consider video or audio recording for later analysis (Greer, 2010).

Face-to-Face Communication

I find the face-to-face communication to be the best form of communication.  Usually, if someone comes to see you in person it has to be very important because they could have called or emailed.  But for whatever reason, they want to get their point across.  Since Jane was talking to Mark in person, I felt that she made it more personable.   With her being in person, Mark can ask any questions and write down the details since he was at his desk.

The best form of communication to use for this example is face-to-face communication because of the sense of urgency.  In my opinion, each of these three forms of communication are equal, but presenting them in different manners makes one seem better than the other.  Deciding which form of communication to use can also depend on the situation.  As a matter of fact, using a combination of two forms of communication is probably the most effective way to communicate.  For example, if I really needed to talk to someone about something important, then I would speak to that person face-to-face and give him or her a written document to reinforce what we talked about.  No form of communication is concrete if all of the details are not present and the information is not presented clearly.

Communication is vital on any project team.  The communication plan should be presented in the first instructional design meeting by the project manager.  It should contain information about what information will be shared, who will share the information, how often, what form it will take and when it will be distributed (Greer, 2010).  In order to avoid conflict, team members need to meet regularly and come up with ideas to help each other communicate effectively.

(2012). Retrieved from The art of effective communication: http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6145/03/mm/aoc/index.html

Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to rock your projects! (Laureate custom). Baltimore: Laureate Education, Inc. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201260_02/MS_INDT/EDUC_6145/Week%202/Resources/Week%202%20Resources/embedded/Murphy_W2_6145.pdf

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

5 thoughts on “Communicating Effectively

    etraugott said:
    September 23, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    I found your interpretation of the different forms of communication to be dead on. In my work experience I find that often times email and voice mail can so easily be misinterpreted. You brought up a lot of the reasons that this could happen. I have found that when I have something important to communicate, I make every effort to do that face to face, or in real time via phone or video chat. I know numerous times that I have interpreted an email from a boss or coworker to have meaning other than what was intended. If you are not the type of person to confront that person over it, or ask about it, it could lead to bigger issues when the perceived message starts to spiral out of control. Before you know it, you have issues with someone, or they with you, and it was over something that didn’t even initially exist. All of it could have been avoided with more effective communication.

    S Tatum said:
    September 23, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    “I perceived this message to be impersonal, yet important enough to write down so that Mark will have something to reference.”

    I find this point interesting and the fact that each of our individual perceptions to these three methods of communication is so diverse. I think the email was very personal because it was informal, I realize in today’s society emails are common place and have been delegated to lower forms of communication but I think they are often vital. Troy Achong in this week’s web presentation discusses each individual’s agenda and how these agenda’s affect the dynamics of every project. I think Jane had an agenda for being vague and waiting to meet Mark face to face. Emails are used as verification and it gives Jane documentation to support her case if necessary. As you stated she never gave Mark any details as to which aspect of the project was vital to her completing her assignment.
    Virtual communication has become an asset and hindrance for organizations around the world.
    …teams that contain members who are geographically dispersed and/or electronically dependent are growing in number, yet problematic issues arise when group interactions take place using technology rather than face-to-face interaction. One reason for this is the difficulty of capturing gestures, nonverbal cues, symbolic content, and contextual information using virtual communication channels—all aspects to communication that vary widely across cultures (Hall, 1976). (Gibson & Daniel, 2010, p.453)
    I did not get the impression Jane asked Mark if he needed any assistance to discover if this was the reason for any delays. Communication is defined as an exchange of information; therefore all parties need to express their needs, expectations, and desires.

    References

    Gibson, C. McDaniel, D. (2010). Moving Beyond Conventional Wisdom: Advancements in Cross-Cultural Theories of Leadership, Conflict, and Teams. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 450–462. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375560. Retrieved from http://pps.sagepub.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/content/5/4/450.full.pdf+html

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (n.d.). Practitioner Voices: Strategies for Working with Stakeholders [Video webcast]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1373694_1%26url%3D

      IDT Newbie: K. Riddick responded:
      September 24, 2012 at 1:49 am

      You are absolutely correct. Email has grown to be a formal line of communication in the workplace. It is very effective in situations where people work from home, all across the country or internationally. I think that the main thing to remember is to express ourselves completely, to avoid jargon and acronyms, and to write so that others may understand.

    elsmith75 said:
    September 23, 2012 at 11:52 pm

    I agree with your opinion that face-to-face communication is the most effective. You brought up a point that I had not thought of. If Mark does not read his email on a regular basis he might not receive the message in time. In this case face-to-face communication is the only way to assure that the message was received.

    PM Hut said:
    September 24, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Hi,

    I think if your team is dispersed, then most likely the best communication mean is video conferencing (such as Skype) – provided, of course, you and they have a decent connection.

    Nevertheless, it’s important to keep on using emails for documentation purpose.

Leave a comment